I'm gonna test the i + 1 theory. i + 1 is the idea that all language can be learned inductively, the key is
1. A lowered affective filter. Meaning, if you come into this stressed out or thinking "This is stupid", you won't learn a thing.
2. Understandable input. That means there are aspects of what you are learning that you already know (i), but you are introduced to one item of function you don't know (+1)
No one who has already learned a language has a 0 on a new language, because you can already figure some basic things out with context.
Connectionists say that you hear those things in different contexts, and eventually you learn how to connect them together in a good way. It's related to this idea.
Someone see if they can translate some of this. I'm using simple sentences that would be taught to a child. See if you can guess what I'm saying by context and cross-referencing. Even if you can't translate everything, can you tell me what any of it may say? I don't expect anyone to be able to translate all of it, but if you can figure any of it out, then please try!
Fiz dinhitana no. Sech jut bat uinko.
Fiz pelhitana no. Set pat uinko.
Fiz goru no. Sor ŕelpo uinko. Ŕelgoru no.
Fiz chit no. Sor vip no. Fiz sor uanisa no.
Fiz sopar chit no. Fiz sor bum no. Fiz sor giisa san no.
Fiz Chiro no. Sor bum no. Sor sopar FATPO no! Aaa!
Fiz pul no. Sor bum no. Sor sopar toto no. Haha!
Fiz pulzhul no. Pin ŕisnam no. Mmmm!
Fiz laos no. Pin lao no.
Fiz lom's no. Pin lom no.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AYhrHwzY_90
Fiz uan no.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t3217H8JppI
Fiz sopar uan no.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9bZkp7q19f0
Fiz uan nona... Gaa!
There you go. There should be enough there to get past the 0 stage to the 1 stage. I also left hints about phrases past the first sentence for each example.