Eww...Algebraic Functions

Homework giving you a headache? Math gives you a migraine? Can't quite figure out how to do something in photoshop? Never fear, the other members of CAA share their expertise in this forum.

Eww...Algebraic Functions

Postby RubyJewelStone » Tue May 29, 2007 8:38 pm

I don't understand one lick of it. It's just way too confusing. The SAT book's explanation (or lack of) was far to sparse for me to grasp. And I can't seem to find a site that is both thorough and to the point. After all, I don't have time to reinvent the wheel. I'm out of school, and my SAT test is this Saturday, and I don't understand functions.

But if anyone could point me in the direction of a veeerrry good explain. I mean an explanation so good that an elementary kid could understand, I would looove you!

After all, it's not a matter of what part don't I understand, I don't understand ANY of it.

:?:
I believe in the sun even if it isn't shining. I believe in love even when I am alone. I believe in God even when he is silent.
~Author Unknown
User avatar
RubyJewelStone
 
Posts: 228
Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 8:11 am
Location: Glued to a computer chair *spins*

Postby Technomancer » Tue May 29, 2007 8:53 pm

What are you required to know about functions? That might affect the depth and breadth of any explanations. In terms of the basic defintion, a function is any operation on a variable x such that for any given value of x there is only one resulting output of the operation.

In other words, given some value x, a function of x is an operation f(x) such that the outcome y=f(x) is unique. For example:

f(x)=x^2 is a function since for any value of x there is a unique value for the result.

f(x)=sqrt(x) is not a function as it is defined here, since the result of any operation on x is not unique. e.g. sqrt(4)=+2 or -2.

f(x)=sin(x) is a function since there is only one possible result for a given value of x.

The domain of a function is the set of permissible values of x. For example:
the domain of f(x)=x^2 is all of the real number line.

the domain of 1/x is all of the real number except for x=0.


The range of a function is set of all possible values of f(x) given the domain.
For example, the range of f(x)=x^2 is the set of all real numbers greater than or equal to zero (ignoring complex values for x for the time being.)

You could also try the following explanation:
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Function.html
The scientific method," Thomas Henry Huxley once wrote, "is nothing but the normal working of the human mind." That is to say, when the mind is working; that is to say further, when it is engaged in corrrecting its mistakes. Taking this point of view, we may conclude that science is not physics, biology, or chemistry—is not even a "subject"—but a moral imperative drawn from a larger narrative whose purpose is to give perspective, balance, and humility to learning.

Neil Postman
(The End of Education)

Anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge

Isaac Aasimov
User avatar
Technomancer
 
Posts: 2379
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2003 11:47 am
Location: Tralfamadore

Postby Icarus » Tue May 29, 2007 9:49 pm

To save a bit of clicking, a one to one function means that not only is the value of the function unique for that value of x, but that that value of x is the only one that will give that result.
The Forsworn War of 34

††
User avatar
Icarus
 
Posts: 1477
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2003 5:00 am
Location: 34

Postby RubyJewelStone » Wed May 30, 2007 8:35 am

Thanks. I think hat helped a bit. Now my issue is here since I'm at loss for this part.

Where the heck did g(x+3) come from in the example on 261 (the written part, not the graph)?

And for page 262 why is the choice E and not B. How can x-1 shift right? I must not be on the same wave here since I don't get the logic of functions very well at all.

Image
Image
I believe in the sun even if it isn't shining. I believe in love even when I am alone. I believe in God even when he is silent.
~Author Unknown
User avatar
RubyJewelStone
 
Posts: 228
Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 8:11 am
Location: Glued to a computer chair *spins*

Postby Technomancer » Wed May 30, 2007 3:59 pm

Page 261 is simply a case of bad wording. What they are try to say is that you should be able to calculate and identify functions that have been shifted in their independant variable (i.e. x). In this case, the author has chosen to g(x) to be a generic concept, and f(x) to be a specific example of a problem.

On page 262, you are given multiple choices for the plot of f(x-1). Remember, that this is a shift in x. We can calculate the original function f(x) as

{f(0)=1, f(1)=2, f(2)=1, f(3)=0, f(4)=-1}

where f(x) is undefined for x<0.

The above list is derived from simple observation.

Therefore: f(x-1)=
{ f(1-1)=1, f(2-1)=2, f(3-1)=1, f(4-1)=0, f(5-1)=-1}

Inspection will reveal that this corresponds to a right shift of the entire function.
The scientific method," Thomas Henry Huxley once wrote, "is nothing but the normal working of the human mind." That is to say, when the mind is working; that is to say further, when it is engaged in corrrecting its mistakes. Taking this point of view, we may conclude that science is not physics, biology, or chemistry—is not even a "subject"—but a moral imperative drawn from a larger narrative whose purpose is to give perspective, balance, and humility to learning.

Neil Postman
(The End of Education)

Anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge

Isaac Aasimov
User avatar
Technomancer
 
Posts: 2379
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2003 11:47 am
Location: Tralfamadore

Postby Mithrandir » Wed May 30, 2007 5:04 pm

TM, when I read that last sentence, I imagined you with a british accent, and I was like, "what kind of shift..."
User avatar
Mithrandir
 
Posts: 11071
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2003 12:00 pm
Location: You will be baked. And then there will be cake.

Postby Technomancer » Thu May 31, 2007 3:21 am

Well, it's been a right hard day...
The scientific method," Thomas Henry Huxley once wrote, "is nothing but the normal working of the human mind." That is to say, when the mind is working; that is to say further, when it is engaged in corrrecting its mistakes. Taking this point of view, we may conclude that science is not physics, biology, or chemistry—is not even a "subject"—but a moral imperative drawn from a larger narrative whose purpose is to give perspective, balance, and humility to learning.

Neil Postman
(The End of Education)

Anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge

Isaac Aasimov
User avatar
Technomancer
 
Posts: 2379
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2003 11:47 am
Location: Tralfamadore

Postby RubyJewelStone » Fri Jun 01, 2007 4:24 pm

Thanks.
I believe in the sun even if it isn't shining. I believe in love even when I am alone. I believe in God even when he is silent.
~Author Unknown
User avatar
RubyJewelStone
 
Posts: 228
Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 8:11 am
Location: Glued to a computer chair *spins*


Return to Tutorials

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 81 guests