cultural naturalism

Homework giving you a headache? Math gives you a migraine? Can't quite figure out how to do something in photoshop? Never fear, the other members of CAA share their expertise in this forum.

cultural naturalism

Postby yukinon » Thu May 05, 2005 1:03 pm

I have a philosophy paper due in about a week in which I have to write about a specific cultural consequence of naturalism. It'll be lots of fun, but the thing is, I can't think of any specific cultural consequences to write on. I know they're out there, I just can't pinpoint them, ne? The class is based around some of C.S. Lewis's writings on naturalism. (Problem of Pain, Abolition of Man, Miracles, Mere Christianity, That Hideous Strength)

Anyway, any ideas? Here's a quick definition of naturalism, if needed. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalism
User avatar
yukinon
 
Posts: 652
Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 1:06 pm
Location: with a diva rabbit

Postby termyt » Fri May 06, 2005 8:21 am

I'm not that well versed in theatrical philosophies, but I believe naturalism attempts to make the play or movie seem more realistic by using commonly spoken language like slang and profanity as well as high-detailed, believable set design. So in otherwise, it minimizes the need of the audience to suspend disbelief by offering a setting that is already very believable.

That said, it is the single most significant form of theater in the US today since virtually every movie and TV show does exactly that. Even a movie like Spider-Man is naturalistic in that the characters act and speak in a manner that would be expected if they were really wandering around New York City - which is also very realistic.
[color="Red"]Please visit Love146.org[/color]
A member of the Society of Hatted Members
Image
If your pedantic about grammar, its unlikely that you'll copy and paste this into your sig, to.
User avatar
termyt
 
Posts: 4289
Joined: Sat Jun 26, 2004 12:00 pm
Location: oHIo

Postby yukinon » Fri May 06, 2005 8:23 am

I think it's more of a philosophical naturalism that the paper is supposed to be about.
User avatar
yukinon
 
Posts: 652
Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 1:06 pm
Location: with a diva rabbit

Postby Technomancer » Fri May 06, 2005 10:08 am

Well, there are several different definitions of "naturalism" depending on the context in which you're working one of which is your Wikipedia article. You may be instead referring to the question of naturalistic world views: ontological naturalism which holds that only natural causes or processes exist (this should of course, be distinguished from methodological naturalism)

In any event, you could try here:
http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/nontheism/naturalism/index.shtml

(or you could be interested in naturalists who are nature-lovers). Realistically though, don't rely to heavily on the internet for your research including my own link.
The scientific method," Thomas Henry Huxley once wrote, "is nothing but the normal working of the human mind." That is to say, when the mind is working; that is to say further, when it is engaged in corrrecting its mistakes. Taking this point of view, we may conclude that science is not physics, biology, or chemistry—is not even a "subject"—but a moral imperative drawn from a larger narrative whose purpose is to give perspective, balance, and humility to learning.

Neil Postman
(The End of Education)

Anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge

Isaac Aasimov
User avatar
Technomancer
 
Posts: 2379
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2003 11:47 am
Location: Tralfamadore

Postby yukinon » Fri May 06, 2005 10:37 am

Exactly, naturalism as a worldview. Gomen, I'm used to using these terms in class and everyone understanding the implied meanings.

It's not really a research paper, more of an opinion paper. I understand naturalism, it's pinpointing specific cultural consequences of it that I'm having trouble with.

Anyone familiar with the debate between C.S. Lewis and G.E.M. Anscombe on naturalism? We studied it in class this year. (My teacher is insane. But entertaining.)
User avatar
yukinon
 
Posts: 652
Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 1:06 pm
Location: with a diva rabbit

Postby Kaori » Fri May 06, 2005 3:12 pm

I don't know if this helps much, but the consequence of naturalism in literature in the twentieth century was a tone of pessimism and despair; literature from this time period tends to focus on only the negative and ugly aspects of life.
Let others believe in the God who brings men to trial and judges them. I shall cling to the God who resurrects the dead.
-St. Nikolai Velimirovich

MAL
User avatar
Kaori
 
Posts: 1463
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 4:48 pm
Location: 一羽の鳥が弧を描いてゆく

Postby yukinon » Sun May 08, 2005 9:26 am

oooo, focusing on literature could be fun. ^^ And then I could take up page space talking about nihilism too...ah, the skills you learn in college. :D
User avatar
yukinon
 
Posts: 652
Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 1:06 pm
Location: with a diva rabbit


Return to Tutorials

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests