The DNA was possum DNA. I'm pretty sure Opossums aren't the missing link.
Momo-P (post: 1254039) wrote:You mean they're not?!
But seriously, why people rely on bigfoot to be the missing link just boggles my mind. Even if evolution takes places over time, we should still have loads of monkey men running around. Heck, there should be loads of "inbetweens" for all animals running around...yet there are none. But Bigfoot suddenly is going to be it?
Momo-P (post: 1254039) wrote:But seriously, why people rely on bigfoot to be the missing link just boggles my mind. Even if evolution takes places over time, we should still have loads of monkey men running around. Heck, there should be loads of "inbetweens" for all animals running around...yet there are none. But Bigfoot suddenly is going to be it?
Technomancer (post: 1254042) wrote:The idea of a "missing link" (or the need for one) is a product of early 20th century reporting, and is not one that has any currency among scientists. Bigfoot (if it existed) would be a very interesting specimen and would certainly have an interesting evolutionary history in its own right, but is unlikely to add significantly to our knowledge of our own species' history.
Hospitalier wrote:There are thousands of independent big foot sightings, many by multiple reliable witnesses. Even if you take into account misidentifications, bias, and possible hysteria, there are still way to many sightings for this to all just be made up.
That Dude (post: 1259740) wrote:I mean we're finding new animal species every day. In the aftermath of the big tsunami back in 03 I think, they found over 150 new animal species. So though this press release ended up being fake, it's totally possible that they're out there.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 322 guests