Gantz
PostPosted: Fri Jun 23, 2006 12:57 pm
Thanks go to valdrianth for this timely review. ^^
http://www.christiananime.net/reviews.php?display=228
http://www.christiananime.net/reviews.php?display=228
The place for Christians who like anime.
http://christiananime.com./
kaji wrote:I agree that this series maxes out the negative ratings on our charts.
kaji wrote:How can you say it "Isnt that bad?" Even if you are being comparative, there is no such thing as a lesser-bad or a lesser-good. Atleast not in the eyes of God.
uc pseudonym wrote:Would you suggest that instead of ratings from 1 to 10 we simply have a "Yes" or "No" beside each area of content? The purpose of the ratings is to provide a comparative analysis of how graphic the content really is, not to rate them as appropriate or inappropriate. Previously, I was basing my comments off the manga, assuming that the anime would be less graphic as is usually the case. Now I have discovered that is not the case.
Forgive me if you feel I'm a bit defensive, but let me go back to something you said. "There is no such thing as a lesser-bad or a lesser-good" - I agree with that. In fact, I agree with it totally. Suikoden is on my mind recently because I've been looking at those threads, so I'll use it as an example. On a theological level, I have to condemn that series exactly as much as I would Gantz. Both present sin, which is equal in the eyes of God. If I believed that this made a series wrong in and of itself then I would watch or read nothing whatsoever.
I dont think anyone has condemned any other person here so Im not sure where that came from.But I don't believe that is the case. I don't think that portraying sin is the same as sin itself. I do think that it can be wrong for an individual if the sexual content is a temptation for them or if they wallow in the violence. It can also be inadvisable if it leads to destructive thought patterns or negative changes in behavior. However, it is not in and of itself wrong. The majority of people wouldn't want to read/watch something like Gantz for legitimate reasons, but I don't think it is good to condemn anyone who may watch the series.
kaji wrote:But what I do not understand is how the over-all rating of somthing like this can not reflect its various short commings. What I mean is that Gantz was given an 8/10 (a pretty good score) despite being highly offensive in just about every area. That is what was meant when I called the review secular.
kaji wrote:How can you say it "Isnt that bad?"
kaji wrote:But what I think you (and all of us) need to realize is that our actions in areas like this have a farther reaching effect then our own spiritual lives. By buying, watching, or even just downloading somthing like this, you are promoting it. Your choice has a dirrect impact on the people who make the stuff to the team that does the fan-sub, down to the kid whom this may cause to sin...
Sheol777 wrote:I might have to finally check this out.