Page 1 of 2

Calvin and Hobbes live-action film coming sometime in 2011

PostPosted: Sat Sep 11, 2010 8:53 pm
by Fish and Chips
Image
Cinema Culture wrote:There is probably no American comic strip more beloved than Calvin and Hobbes. Originally running in syndicated newspapers from 1985 to 1995, Bill Watterson's timeless cartoon creation is still enjoyed today by millions of fans, many of who hadn't even grown up with the strip in circulation. Almost equally famous is Watterson's unwavering refusal of merchandising his cherished comic.

"Actually, I wasn't against all merchandising when I started the strip," explained Watterson in 2005, "But each product I considered seemed to violate the spirit of the strip, contradict its message, and take me away from the work I loved. If my syndicate had let it go at that, the decision would have taken maybe 30 seconds of my life."

Yet, despite Watterson's repeated wishes, a number of illegal, often unflattering products have surfaced, leaving some to despair the only Calvin and Hobbes related merchandising would be both underground and in bad taste.

Until today.

In a quietly circulated press release, relative newcomer director Rajat Tulient, previously known for his short films set in his native India, has announced he plans to premiere a feature-length Calvin and Hobbes film in early 2011, a project he's kept secret from the larger press for the majority of its filming, just today entering the first stages of post-production.

"It was important to keep things quiet," Tulient confided at the release, "Calvin and Hobbes is a very lasting icon of American popular culture. I knew if we announced it early on, there'd be heavy opposition. My hope is that now that the film is reaching completion, people will be more inclined to give it a chance and not write it off a commercialism attempt."

The most difficult issue was getting Watterson to agree to the film, who would ultimately co-write the script with Tulient.

"If it was anyone else, I would have flatly refused. But when Rajat came to meet with me in person, and we talked, I realized he was probably the one person who could truly make something in the spirit of the strip."

Since that eventful evening, Tulient and his staff had gone to great lengths to keep the project under wraps, fearing public outcry and mass media attention, culminating in the casting of virtual unknowns to bring Watterson's beloved characters to life. "Rest assured, we have only considered actors we feel would do the characters justice."

Concerning the filming of Hobbes, Tulient was remarkably silent, hinting only that they would be trying "Something new." Rumors have since appeared that Tulient may have struck a deal with Weta Digital, though these are unconfirmed.

Calvin and Hobbes will be Rajat Tulient's first foray into feature-length films, and a serious break from his prior body of work. Tulient first appeared on the director scene in 2007 with "His Bicycle," a thirty-minute story of a father dealing with his son's death by sorting through his belongings and finding the first gift he ever gave him, a red bicycle. In 2008 he followed up with "Underground Traffic," another short film focusing on three businessmen (Indian, Japanese, and American) and an unemployed writer trapped in a subway for an entire day after a machinery breakdown. Both films were released to limited audience but received almost universal praise.

Tulient has not set a date for Calvin and Hobbes, saying to expected it early in 2011, although a promotional trailer will be available in December.
Source

PostPosted: Sat Sep 11, 2010 8:57 pm
by Solid Ronin
I hear about this on Anit it Cool. Course I thought it a bad joke. But screw it! I'll go for it!

PostPosted: Sat Sep 11, 2010 8:59 pm
by Yuki-Anne
I'm not incredibly optimistic, but it is a good sign that they got Watterson in on it. And considering how closely he guards Calvin and Hobbes, that gives me some hope.

PostPosted: Sat Sep 11, 2010 9:12 pm
by Htom Sirveaux
Yeah, and since the director got Bill Watterson's own approval, and Watterson himself co-wrote the script, I would say I'm cautiously optimistic.

PostPosted: Sat Sep 11, 2010 9:12 pm
by Furen
I think I'll give it a shot.

PostPosted: Sat Sep 11, 2010 9:41 pm
by Warrior 4 Jesus
Hmm... Weird. Tintin and Hobbes, I mean Calvin and Hobbes. I love the comic strip. I just hope the movie is good. I wonder how they're going to make the movie in this day and age? I mean, Calvin's not very politically correct and he does all the mischevous things the average child did because they were a child and if they did them now, would be labelled dangerous or unstable or something.
It's great to hear that it has Bill Watterson's approval. That must've been difficult.

PostPosted: Sat Sep 11, 2010 10:44 pm
by Peanut
I SOO hope that this is going to be good.

PostPosted: Sat Sep 11, 2010 11:24 pm
by bigsleepj
Personally, I think it might have worked better as an animated story; I can't entirely imagine it working as a live-action property.

PostPosted: Sat Sep 11, 2010 11:25 pm
by Blitzkrieg1701
Ha ha ha ha, very funny.

PostPosted: Sun Sep 12, 2010 5:55 am
by Atria35
I'd rather have it animated, but I'm a little excited about this, since they got Watterson to help write the script.

PostPosted: Sun Sep 12, 2010 6:17 am
by Sheol777
Image
yes I know...

PostPosted: Sun Sep 12, 2010 1:19 pm
by rocklobster
This sounds good, but I'm wary. How are they going to explain Hobbes' existance?

PostPosted: Sun Sep 12, 2010 1:24 pm
by Cognitive Gear
As with most film related things, I will reserve judgement until I see more.

Though I now have a new director to look into, so if nothing else, that's a good thing.

PostPosted: Sun Sep 12, 2010 1:29 pm
by FllMtl Novelist
Sheol777 (post: 1423683) wrote:Image
yes I know...

Ditto.

PostPosted: Sun Sep 12, 2010 5:22 pm
by Furen
Blitzkrieg1701 (post: 1423641) wrote:Ha ha ha ha, very funny.


No seriously it's true.

PostPosted: Sun Sep 12, 2010 6:34 pm
by Warrior 4 Jesus
Hmm... Guys, I think we've been had. Fish's source takes you to an image of a Joker-like face and I can't find any information on the Internet about there being a live-action version. Naughty Fish!

PostPosted: Sun Sep 12, 2010 7:00 pm
by FllMtl Novelist
*reads W4J's post*

*actually clicks 'source' now*

...

Oh my gosh... I thought I was more intelligent than this! D:

Somebody tell me I wasn't the only one... >.>

(Bravo FishandChips! XD)

PostPosted: Sun Sep 12, 2010 7:01 pm
by goldenspines
To think, for a moment there, I was sure my happy childhood memories were about to be smashed...

PostPosted: Sun Sep 12, 2010 7:54 pm
by Blitzkrieg1701
I was wondering how long it would take anyone else to actually click that.

PostPosted: Sun Sep 12, 2010 8:01 pm
by Warrior 4 Jesus
I feel like I just read 'Gullible's Travels' by Jonathan Swift.

PostPosted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 12:19 am
by ShiroiHikari
Psh, who actually checks sources?

PostPosted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 3:50 pm
by Htom Sirveaux
Ooohhhhh.
Teach me not to bother checking the "source". XD

PostPosted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 4:07 pm
by Atria35
Oh, snap. He got us good.

PostPosted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 5:17 pm
by Yuki-Anne
Oh man. I feel dumb.

PostPosted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 6:00 pm
by ich1990
You know, when I read that I thought "my, that sounds an awful lot like Fish's writing style". I just never put two and two together.

This especially sounded odd:
Since that eventful evening, Tulient and his staff had gone to great lengths to keep the project under wraps, fearing public outcry and mass media attention, culminating in the casting of virtual unknowns to bring Watterson's beloved characters to life.

PostPosted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 6:17 pm
by Furen
I saw the source at the beginning but thought nothing of it,
Bravo Fish

PostPosted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 6:27 pm
by Warrior 4 Jesus
Ah ha! I think I have it! Fish may have taken material from an interview with Maurice Sendak and his encounter with Spike Jonze in bringing Where The Wild Things Are to the screen. I thought the exchange sounded familiar. Obviously Fish, clever as he is, changed many of the details and inserted obscure references to throw us for the loop.

PostPosted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 7:36 pm
by Fish and Chips
ShiroiHikari (post: 1423883) wrote:Psh, who actually checks sources?
Coincidentally, this here was the actual joke.
Warrior 4 Jesus (post: 1424063) wrote:Ah ha! I think I have it! Fish may have taken material from an interview with Maurice Sendak and his encounter with Spike Jonze in bringing Where The Wild Things Are to the screen. I thought the exchange sounded familiar. Obviously Fish, clever as he is, changed many of the details and inserted obscure references to throw us for the loop.
I don't even know who that is.

The only things I borrowed were Watterson's opening quote and the fake movie poster. The quote is from here. I have no idea where the movie poster is from.

PostPosted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 8:13 pm
by Yamamaya
I bet this will be like Garfield 2. We all know how fantastic Garfield 2 was right?

PostPosted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 9:36 pm
by Shao Feng-Li
I was instant skeptical knowing what Waterson's said about such things.

No matter what, the idea of a movie makes me ill.