Radical Dreamer (post: 1376199) wrote:Well, what I'm starting to wonder now is whether or not these color schemes are meant to be seen separately or as a full color scheme used on one particular item. XD The result could be different depending on which one it is. XD
Radical Dreamer (post: 1376135) wrote:#1: Expensive/well made]Pascal (post: 1376195) wrote:Cheap: #2 (Horrible color choices, who sticks red next to green O_O [The horrible glowing orange edges!])
Alright hold on there people, please understand (as it seems I failed to make this properly clear, I apologize) that the arrangement of the palette itself is not the issue (though clearly it affects your choices, I anticipated that, to a degree).Radical Dreamer (post: 1376199) wrote:Well, what I'm starting to wonder now is whether or not these color schemes are meant to be seen separately or as a full color scheme used on one particular item. XD The result could be different depending on which one it is. XD
Ah, didn’t make this clear either I guess. You are meant to look at the colors individually within a particular palette, and then, overall not as a ‘color scheme’ but as a group of colors. If the overall feeling is cheap or expensive, that’s what matters, not how well they’d go together in a single product.Rusty Claymore (post: 1376216) wrote:1. moderate. they are almost all full squares, and only have a few smudges and shadows.
2. cheap. The squares are warped most, and the shadow above and below the white square is ugly.
3. expensive. Most square like squares, little or no noticeable shadows, just a little smudging. Although purple is kinda sloppy.
Yipe! Easy there, it’s not about how well made the palette itself is, focus on the colors, just the colors, the palettes are only really there in order to separate groups.Nate (post: 1376163) wrote:Hey I remember you. D:
Although I'm pretty sure you'd rather I didn't. But anyway.
Abassi wrote:Yipe! Easy there, it’s not about how well made the palette itself is, focus on the colors, just the colors, the palettes are only really there in order to separate groups.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 172 guests