Nate (post: 1440376) wrote:This is one of those areas where it's hard to say what is the right thing to do.
Obviously I don't want her to be executed. I think she did nothing wrong. I think it would be a huge violation of human rights to execute her.
HOWEVER, reading the article, it's clear if the woman isn't executed, things could become even more violent. Many others may die in a revolt, and worse yet, if the revolt succeeds, things would probably become even worse for Christians. That's obviously a horrible thing too.
This is a moral gray area and it's very, very difficult to decide what the "right" thing to do is. Is the suffering of one preferable to the suffering of many? If so, she should be executed. Is protecting the weak and innocent always right, even if countless others die because of that decision, and others in the future are treated worse? Then she should not be.
It's extremely complicated, and I'm glad I don't have to make the final decision.
Nate (post: 1440438) wrote:You're ignoring the possibility of the extremists winning in a revolt, which would make things worse for everyone. There's no guarantee the current government would win that fight, you know that, right?
Nate (post: 1440438) wrote:That's why I said it's tricky. You can say that yeah, the extremists would probably lose but then you fall into the problem of people saying that yeah, the Vikings will probably win the Super Bowl now that they have Brett Favre and well...look at their current record.
Yamamaya wrote:There's also the possibility that U.S. troops would end up getting involved in that brawl
Nate (post: 1440445) wrote:Why would the US get involved?
To go to war, you have to have a cause. Self-defense is one cause. Defending an allied country being attacked is a second cause. Otherwise you need UN approval. I don't see the UN giving approval for one woman's life, and we're certainly not allies of Pakistan, and it isn't self-defense, so I can't see how the US could get involved.
And even if we could, then you have to say, is the death of all the US soldiers that went worth the lives of one woman? What if those soldiers don't even care about this woman? Why should they have to die just so she can live?
Nate (post: 1440376) wrote:This is one of those areas where it's hard to say what is the right thing to do.
Obviously I don't want her to be executed. I think she did nothing wrong. I think it would be a huge violation of human rights to execute her.
HOWEVER, reading the article, it's clear if the woman isn't executed, things could become even more violent. Many others may die in a revolt, and worse yet, if the revolt succeeds, things would probably become even worse for Christians. That's obviously a horrible thing too.
This is a moral gray area and it's very, very difficult to decide what the "right" thing to do is. Is the suffering of one preferable to the suffering of many? If so, she should be executed. Is protecting the weak and innocent always right, even if countless others die because of that decision, and others in the future are treated worse? Then she should not be.
It's extremely complicated, and I'm glad I don't have to make the final decision.
Shao Feng-Li wrote:One has to do what's right in spite of any what ifs, I would think.
Hats wrote:"Frodo! Cast off your [s]sins[/s] into the fire!"
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 263 guests