Postby Technomancer » Mon Jan 12, 2009 9:23 am
The timing of the Christmas was indeed chosen to coincide with pre-existing pagan holidays. There were some theological/calendrical reasons for this, as well as for the more practical need to overshadow, or at least be somewhat in sync with, the world in which they lived. There is also the fact that the winter solstice would be a more instructive and emotionally satisfying day to celebrate Christ's birth (the darkest days of the year are now past after all). Much of our Christmas symbolism is certainly pagan in origin, although once again it is readily adapted for Christian purposes (evergreen -> ever-living, etc).
This was done with full consciousness on the part of the Church authorties, and with the specific advice of Pope St. Gregory the Great.
There are some people who make an issue of this, as if it were some kind of secret. "Christmas" is an artificial invention of perfidious Christians, and is therefore simply fake. Such a view is nonsense of course, as most of us are well aware of the pagan origins of the timing and outward forms of Christmas celebration. However, these issues are inconsequential when compared to what is being celebrated, and that is what is genuine. The other matters are merely accidents of history and geography.
The scientific method," Thomas Henry Huxley once wrote, "is nothing but the normal working of the human mind." That is to say, when the mind is working; that is to say further, when it is engaged in corrrecting its mistakes. Taking this point of view, we may conclude that science is not physics, biology, or chemistry—is not even a "subject"—but a moral imperative drawn from a larger narrative whose purpose is to give perspective, balance, and humility to learning.
Neil Postman
(The End of Education)
Anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge
Isaac Aasimov